✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Languages are structurally affected by substrates versus superstrates
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that languages are structurally affected by substrates versus superstrates?
Yes. Substrate and superstrate languages significantly influence and shape the structural properties of languages undergoing contact and creolization.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The analysis
The retrieved papers include studies that directly examine and quantify how substrate and superstrate languages influence the grammatical and prosodic structures of contact-induced languages, supporting the claim.
Evidence for · 2
Get citation
Holm, J. & Intumbo, I. (2009). Quantifying superstrate and substrate influence. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24.2.02hol
See more details
More for · 1
Get citation
K, Y. (2021). Creole Prosodic Systems Are Areal, Not Simple.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690593
What does the evidence say?
The retrieved papers include studies that directly examine and quantify how substrate and superstrate languages influence the grammatical and prosodic structures of contact-induced languages, supporting the claim.
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8104 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work