trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Journal access models significantly influence an author's choice of publication venue

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that journal access models significantly influence an author's choice of publication venue?

Yes. Evidence indicates that journal access models, particularly article processing charges and open access policies, significantly shape authors' decisions regarding where to publish their research.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers examine how financial barriers, funding requirements, and open access publishing models (like APCs) impact researchers' choices of publication venues. Papers 4 and 8 explicitly address author perspectives and hurdles regarding open access and APCs, showing how these access structures influence venue selection.

Evidence for · 2
2020
Get citation
Pilato, V. & Tran, C. Y. (2020). Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2349

See more details
More for · 1
2025
Get citation
N, K., Z, A., P, M., & C, H. (2025). Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.250257

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8004 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work