trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Inter-stimulus intervals affect cognitive processing and response accuracy in experiments
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies demonstrate that inter-stimulus intervals and related temporal parameters significantly modulate neural processing, electrophysiological responses, and cognitive task performance.

Evidence for · 5
Dissociable effects of inter-stimulus interval and presentation duration on rapid face categorization
2018 · cited by 23
Paper [0] demonstrates that varying inter-stimulus intervals and presentation rates significantly alters visual categorization responses and delays EEG onset.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently show that variations in inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) or stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) affect various aspects of cognitive processing, neural responses (such as ERP amplitudes and EEG patterns), and behavioral measures like reaction time and accuracy. No retrieved papers refute the general claim that inter-stimulus intervals affect cognitive processing and response accuracy.

More for · 4
Effects of Inter-Stimulus Interval on Speech-Evoked Frequency-Following Response in Elderly Adults
2018 · cited by 5
Paper [2] examines the effect of inter-stimulus intervals on speech-evoked frequency-following responses in adults, testing timing parameters in auditory processing.
Effects of inter-stimulus and inter-trial intervals on somatosensory gating
2024 · cited by 2
Paper [4] shows that varying inter-stimulus intervals significantly affects somatosensory gating amplitude ratios in electroencephalography evaluations.
N1 facilitation at short Inter-Stimulus-Interval (ISI) occurs under 400 ms and is dependent on ISI from previous sounds: Evidence using an unpredictable auditory stimulation sequence.
2024 · cited by 1
Paper [7] establishes that auditory evoked potential amplitudes heavily depend on the inter-stimulus interval and its temporal history.
Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.
2026 · cited by 0
Paper [9] investigates temporal overlaps and interval parameters like response-stimulus intervals to predict task performance and cognitive processing.
Everything we examined (12)
We also searched for evidence AGAINST this claim, not only for it.
  1. Dissociable effects of inter-stimulus interval and presentation duration on rapid face categorizationpeer-reviewedsupports
  2. Processing of attentional and emotional stimuli depends on retrospective response of foot pressure: Conceptualizing neuron-cognitive distribution in human brainpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Effects of Inter-Stimulus Interval on Speech-Evoked Frequency-Following Response in Elderly Adultspeer-reviewedsupports
  4. Resource sharing in cognitive control: Behavioral evidence and neural substratespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. Effects of inter-stimulus and inter-trial intervals on somatosensory gatingpeer-reviewedsupports
  6. Temporal dynamics of dual-task interference in the brain in a simulated driving environmentpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Estimation performance is modulated by emotional valence and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA): evidence from priming paradigmpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. N1 facilitation at short Inter-Stimulus-Interval (ISI) occurs under 400 ms and is dependent on ISI from previous sounds: Evidence using an unpredictable auditory stimulation sequence.peer-reviewedsupports
  9. Trial-By-Trial Changes in Neural Indices of Performance Monitoring Uniquely Correspond to Behavioral Adjustments During a Flanker Task.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.peer-reviewedsupports
  11. Testing differential effects of periodicity and predictability in auditory rhythmic cueing of concurrent speech.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. Modulation of perceived time caused by stimulus clarity in object recognition.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8406 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt