trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Inbreeding is highly efficient at increasing homozygosity in populations.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
6 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that inbreeding is highly efficient at increasing homozygosity in populations?

Yes. Inbreeding consistently increases homozygosity within populations, a process frequently measured and tracked via runs of homozygosity (ROH) and autozygosity across diverse species.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 6 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently support the claim that inbreeding increases homozygosity, frequently discussing it through the lens of runs of homozygosity (ROH), autozygosity, and identity by descent. None of the sources refute the premise. Therefore, the balance verdict is SUPPORTED.

Evidence for · 6
2021
Get citation
Addo, S., Klingel, S., Thaller, G., & Hinrichs, D. (2021). Genetic diversity and the application of runs of homozygosity-based methods for inbreeding estimation in German White-headed Mutton sheep. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250608

See more details
More for · 5
2023
Get citation
Atağ, G., Kaptan, D., Yüncü, E., Vural, K. B., Mereu, P., Pirastru, M., Barbato, M., Leoni, G., Güler, M. N., Er, T., Eker, E., Yazici, T. D., Kılıç, M. S., Altınışık, N. E., Çelik, E., Miranda, P. M., Dehasque, M., Floridia, V., Götherström, A., Bilgin, C. C., Togan, I., Günther, T., Özer, F., Hadjisterkotis, E., & Somel, M. (2023). Population Genomic History of the Endangered Anatolian and Cyprian Mouflons in Relation to Worldwide Wild, Feral, and Domestic Sheep Lineages. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evae090

2024
Get citation
Zeitler, L. & Gilbert, K. J. (2024). Using runs of homozygosity and machine learning to disentangle sources of inbreeding and infer self-fertilization rates. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.20.581206

2026
Get citation
Q, H., J, D., FR, S., H, P., & NK, K. (2026). Genomic partitioning and functional dissection of inbreeding depression for stature in Brown Swiss cattle.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-026-01062-9

2026
Get citation
Sweetalana, S, N., S, H., JA, M., & ZA, S. (2026). Genotypic and phenotypic consequences of domestication in dogs.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkag195

2026
Get citation
L, G., S, B., M, K., A, U., K, A., & O, L. (2026). Evolution of Methods for the Quantitative Assessment of Inbreeding in Livestock.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15070530

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers consistently support the claim that inbreeding increases homozygosity, frequently discussing it through the lens of runs of homozygosity (ROH), autozygosity, and identity by descent. None of the sources refute the premise. Therefore, the balance verdict is SUPPORTED.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8304 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work