trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Improving course quality negatively correlates with student evaluation scores

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
6 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that improving course quality negatively correlates with student evaluation scores?

Yes. Evidence shows that student evaluation scores do not effectively measure teaching quality or learning gains, but instead often reward lower academic standards, easier coursework, and lenient grading.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 6 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Multiple studies and meta-analyses consistently show that student evaluations of teaching (SETs) fail to positively correlate with actual student learning, and often show inverse or negative relationships when grade inflation or objective performance measures are controlled. The literature supports the claim that trying to maximize student evaluation scores incentivizes practices contrary to improving rigorous course quality.

Evidence for · 6
Student Evaluations of Teaching Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
2020
Get citation
Stroebe, W. (2020). Student Evaluations of Teaching Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1756817

See more details
More for · 5
Student evaluations of teaching do not reflect student learning: an observational study
2025
Get citation
Gilbert, R. O. & Gilbert, D. (2025). Student evaluations of teaching do not reflect student learning: an observational study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06896-3

Student Evaluations of Teaching Fail to Predict Learning: Meta-Analysis of Bias, Grade Inflation, and Incentive Distortion in Higher Education
2025
Get citation
Sangwa, D. S. & Nsabiyumva, S. (2025). Student Evaluations of Teaching Fail to Predict Learning: Meta-Analysis of Bias, Grade Inflation, and Incentive Distortion in Higher Education. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.65655/jscsaa20

Student Evaluations of Teaching Fail to Predict Learning: Meta-Analysis of Bias, Grade Inflation, and Incentive Distortion in Higher Education
2025
Get citation
Sangwa, S. & Nsabiyumva, S. (2025). Student Evaluations of Teaching Fail to Predict Learning: Meta-Analysis of Bias, Grade Inflation, and Incentive Distortion in Higher Education. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/9sde6_v1

Student Evaluations of Teaching Fail to Predict Learning: Meta-Analysis of Bias, Grade Inflation, and Incentive Distortion in Higher Education
2025
Get citation
Sangwa, S. & Nsabiyumva, S. (2025). Student Evaluations of Teaching Fail to Predict Learning: Meta-Analysis of Bias, Grade Inflation, and Incentive Distortion in Higher Education. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202509.1763.v1

Why Good Teaching Evaluations May Reward Bad Teaching: On Grade Inflation and Other Unintended Consequences of Student Evaluations.
2016
Get citation
Stroebe, W. (2016). Why Good Teaching Evaluations May Reward Bad Teaching: On Grade Inflation and Other Unintended Consequences of Student Evaluations.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650284

What does the evidence say?

Multiple studies and meta-analyses consistently show that student evaluations of teaching (SETs) fail to positively correlate with actual student learning, and often show inverse or negative relationships when grade inflation or objective performance measures are controlled. The literature supports the claim that trying to maximize student evaluation scores incentivizes practices contrary to improving rigorous course quality.

Receipt History
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8931 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work