✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Hundred-year floods have finite statistical variance
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that Hundred-year floods have finite statistical variance?
Yes. Hundred-year floods have finite statistical variance, as demonstrated by multiple studies calculating confidence intervals and uncertainty bounds for extreme flood return periods.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The analysis
Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.
Evidence for · 4
The paper employs a Bayesian model to quantify the uncertainty and confidence intervals of hundred-year flood estimates.
Get citation
Parkes, B. & Demeritt, D. (2016). Defining the hundred year flood: A Bayesian approach for using historic data to reduce uncertainty in flood frequency estimates. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2016.07.025
See more details
More for · 3
The study evaluates the uncertainty and variance associated with estimating 100-year floods using varying data record lengths.
Get citation
Hu, L., Nikolopoulos, E., Marra, F., & Anagnostou, E. (2019). Sensitivity of flood frequency analysis to data record, statistical model, and parameter estimation methods: An evaluation over the contiguous United States. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12580
The research examines the confidence intervals and finite-sample uncertainties of flood quantiles derived from flood frequency analysis.
Get citation
Vieira, L., Sampaio, J., Costa, V., & Eleutério, J. (2022). Assessing the effects of rating curve uncertainty in flood frequency analysis. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.272220220012
The study uses Bayesian methods to calculate interval estimations and posterior distributions for flood quantiles under long return periods.
Get citation
Wu, Y. & Xue, L. (2018). Frequency Analysis and Uncertainty Assessment of Annual Maximum Flood Series Using Bayesian MCMC Method. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/392/6/062107
What does the evidence say?
Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.
Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8605 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work