trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Humans require a specific minimum daily intake of high-protein foods for optimal physiological function.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that humans require a specific minimum daily intake of high-protein foods for optimal physiological function?

Yes. Clinical and nutritional research demonstrates that humans require adequate daily protein and essential amino acid intake to support optimal physiological function, prevent muscle wasting, and maintain health.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Evidence for · 3
2019
Meeting daily protein intake recommendations decreases the odds of functional disability in older Americans.
Get citation
McGrath, R., Stastny, S., Casperson, S., Jahns, L., Roemmich, J., & Hackney, K. J. (2019). Daily Protein Intake and Distribution of Daily Protein Consumed Decreases Odds for Functional Disability in Older Americans. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319881864

See more details
More for · 2
2022
Establishes baseline human dietary protein requirements (0.8 g/kg/day) and explores methods to determine optimal intake.
Get citation
Wolfe, R., Kim, I., Park, S., & Ferrando, A. (2022). Tracing metabolic flux to assess optimal dietary protein and amino acid consumption. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-022-00817-w

2026
Demonstrates that dietary protein and essential amino acids are necessary for metabolic regulation and preventing muscle loss.
Get citation
G, C. & E, P. (2026). Amino Acids as Metabokines in Hypercatabolic States: Rethinking Nutritional Protein-Based Strategies Beyond Caloric Support.. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18111703

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8405 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work