trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Human core body temperature evolved as an optimal trade-off against fungal infections

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that human core body temperature evolved as an optimal trade-off against fungal infections?

Yes. Evidence supports the hypothesis that mammalian endothermy and high core body temperatures evolved as an optimal trade-off providing a thermal exclusion zone against fungal infections.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Papers 2, 5, and 10 explicitly discuss how mammalian endothermy and high body temperatures function as a thermal restriction zone protecting against fungal pathogens, with paper 5 specifically modeling this as an evolutionary trade-off between metabolic costs and fungal disease resistance. No papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 3
2022
States that elevated temperatures create a thermal restriction zone protecting mammals from most fungal species.
Get citation
Casadevall, A. (2022). Immunity to Invasive Fungal Diseases.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-101220-034306

See more details
More for · 2
2010
Demonstrates through mathematical modeling that mammalian endothermy optimizes the trade-off between the metabolic costs of maintaining high body temperature and the fitness benefit of a thermal exclusion zone against fungal disease.
Get citation
Bergman, A. & Casadevall, A. (2010). Mammalian Endothermy Optimally Restricts Fungi and Metabolic Costs. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00212-10

2017
Explains that low mammalian susceptibility to fungal diseases is largely determined by the thermal gradient acting as a protective barrier against environmental fungi.
Get citation
Casadevall, A. (2017). Don't Forget the Fungi When Considering Global Catastrophic Biorisks. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2017.0048

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8804 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work