trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
High job strain and workplace stressors significantly increase the incidence of major depressive disorders.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
8 sources for · 0 against

Multiple peer-reviewed studies and population-based data confirm that high job strain and workplace stressors significantly elevate the risk of major depressive disorders and depressive symptoms.

Evidence for · 8
2018 · cited by 41
Population-based study showing psychosocial work stressors are strong risk factors for major depressive disorder (MDD).
See more details
The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

More for · 7
2018 · cited by 13
Demonstrates that job strain is attributable for a substantial percentage of major depressive disorders (13.6%).
2024 · cited by 4
Supports a longitudinal association between work-related stress and the onset of major depressive episodes.
2026 · cited by 1
A systematic review and meta-analysis linking higher job strain and psychosocial factors to higher odds of depressive symptoms.
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
2020 · cited by 0
Finds that job demands, job strain, and workplace social support are associated with depressive symptom trajectories.
2026 · cited by 0
Shows a positive correlation between negative workplace stressors like workplace violence and depression among accountants.
2012 · cited by 0
Finds high psychological job demand and job strain significantly associated with depression in breast cancer survivors.
Everything we examined (25)
  1. Wikipedia: Job strainreferencesupports
  2. Wikipedia: Major depressive disorderreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Wikipedia: Occupational health psychologyreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Book: The Handbook of Stress and Healthreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. Book: Oxford Textbook of Public Mental Healthreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Book: Principles of Gender-Specific Medicinereferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Book: Strategic Human Resource Management in the Public Arenareferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Book: Conservative Management of Cervical Spine Syndromesreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Handbook of health psychologyreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health: Psychosocial working characteristics before retirement and depressive symptoms across the retirement transition: a longitudinal latent class analysispeer-reviewedsupports
  11. Human-Animal Interactions: Evaluating perceived stressors and areas of needed support in animal shelter and rescue workers and volunteerspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health: Sense of coherence is significantly associated with both metabolic syndrome and lifestyle in Japanese computer software office workerspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  13. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health: What is needed to make research on the psychosocial work environment and health more meaningful? Reflections and missed opportunities in IPD debatespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  14. Frontiers in Public Health: The moderating role of job satisfaction in the relationship between workplace violence and depression among accountantspeer-reviewedsupports
  15. Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease: Psychosocial Stressors at Work and Atrial Fibrillation Incidence: An 18‐Year Prospective Studypeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  16. OpenAIRE: Job strain in German novice physical therapists / Psychische Beanspruchung am Arbeitsplatz von Berufsanfängern in der Physiotherapiepeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  17. OpenAIRE: Prevalence and risk factors of job strain among laboratory technicians in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  18. OpenAIRE: An examination of stressors, strain, and resilience in academic and non-academic U.K. university job roles.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  19. OpenAIRE: The Relationship between Workplace Stressors and Job Strain with Psychological Distress among Employed Malaysian Breast Cancer Survivorspeer-reviewedsupports
  20. OpenAIRE: Investigating the impact of psychosocial risks and occupational stress on psychiatric hospital nurses' mental well‐being in Japanpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  21. OpenAIRE: Association of Workplace Chronic and Acute Stressors With Employee Weight Status: Data From Worksites in Turmoilpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  22. Occupational factors associated with major depressive disorder: A Brazilian population-based study.peer-reviewedsupports
  23. Job Stress-attributable Burden of Disease in Koreapeer-reviewedsupports
  24. Longitudinal association of exposure to work-related stress with major depressive disorder and the role of occupational burnout in this association in the general populationpeer-reviewedsupports
  25. A systematic review and meta-analysis of depressive symptoms and work-ralated psychoacial factors among healthcare workers.peer-reviewedsupports
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8505 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt