trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Having a child during the tenure track negatively impacts career success for women more than men

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that having a child during the tenure track negatively impacts career success for women more than men?

Yes. Evidence from large-scale academic studies shows that having children disproportionately impacts the career productivity and advancement of women in academia compared to men.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved literature, particularly large-scale empirical studies on academic faculty, directly supports the claim that parenthood negatively impacts women's academic productivity and career advancement on the tenure track to a greater degree than men.

Evidence for · 2
2021
Parenthood explains most of the gender productivity gap by lowering short-term productivity for mothers more than fathers.
Get citation
AC, M., SF, W., MJD, H., DB, L., M, G., & A, C. (2021). The unequal impact of parenthood in academia.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1996

See more details
More for · 1
2024
Parenthood and publishing differences account for a significant portion of the gender gap in academic career advancement.
Get citation
Nielsen, M. W., Pedersen, J. V., & Larregue, J. (2024). Getting ahead in the social sciences: How parenthood and publishing contribute to gender gaps in academic career advancement.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13088

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved literature, particularly large-scale empirical studies on academic faculty, directly supports the claim that parenthood negatively impacts women's academic productivity and career advancement on the tenure track to a greater degree than men.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8804 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work