Ethanol exhibits specific threshold concentrations that limit bacterial and viral survival

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that ethanol exhibits specific threshold concentrations that limit bacterial and viral survival?

Yes. Evidence indicates that ethanol operates effectively within established concentration thresholds (such as 62% to 71%) to ensure rapid microbial and viral inactivation.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 31 Jul 2026

The analysis

The retrieved literature includes papers discussing the specific efficacy thresholds of ethanol and alcohol-based disinfectants against viruses like coronaviruses. The claim is well-supported by established disinfection guidelines and studies showing specific thresholds for antimicrobial and antiviral activity.

Evidence for · 2

Viral Inactivation with Emphasis on SARS-CoV-2 Using Physical and Chemical Disinfectants

2021

Get citation

Fadaei, A. (2021). Viral Inactivation with Emphasis on SARS-CoV-2 Using Physical and Chemical Disinfectants. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9342748

See more details

More for · 1

Inactivation Activities of Ozonated Water, Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water and Ethanol against SARS-CoV-2

2021

Get citation

Takeda, Y., Jamsransuren, D., Makita, Y., Kaneko, A., Matsuda, S., Ogawa, H., & Oh, H. (2021). Inactivation Activities of Ozonated Water, Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water and Ethanol against SARS-CoV-2. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185465

Related receipts

Is it true that people with viral pneumonia are at risk of also developing bacterial pneumonia? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that plants have a specific lower atmospheric pressure limit for survival? PARTIAL LEAN related question, same topic

What does the evidence say?

Receipt History

first checked31 Jul 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8431 Jul 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work