trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Ethanol and water mixtures show positive deviation from Raoult's law due to molecular interactions

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that ethanol and water mixtures show positive deviation from Raoult's law due to molecular interactions?

Yes. Scientific literature confirms that ethanol and water mixtures exhibit positive deviations from Raoult's law due to non-ideal molecular interactions.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Evidence for · 4
1991
Mentions that activity coefficients for ethanol-water show positive deviations from Raoult's law in certain systems.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Liquid-phase adsorption of binary ethanol–water mixtures on high-silica adsorbents. (1991). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1039/ft9918701279

See more details
More for · 3
2012
Explicitly notes that water-ethanol mixtures exhibit positive deviation from Raoult's law for vapor pressure.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Structural Transformations, Composition Anomalies and a Dramatic Collapse of Linear Polymer Chains in Dilute Ethanol–Water Mixtures. (2012). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2085439

2011
Discusses non-ideal molecular interactions in ethanol and water mixtures that enhance vaporization compared to Raoult's law.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Modeling the Influence of Molecular Interactions on the Vaporization of Multi-component Fuel Sprays. (2011). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0387

2025
Notes non-ideal behavior of water-ethanol binary liquids using modified Raoult's law.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Reduced-order modeling of sessile droplet evaporation in binary liquid systems. (2025). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0296820

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Receipt History
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7506 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work