trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Emotional reasoning is a distinct cognitive distortion pattern
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

Psychological literature and reference texts establish that emotional reasoning is a recognized and distinct cognitive distortion.

Evidence for · 4
Wikipedia: Emotional reasoning
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

More for · 3
Book: Parent-child Relations
1994 · cited by 0
Identifies emotional reasoning as a distorted thinking pattern.
OpenAIRE: Prevalence of cognitive distortion markers in a suicide prevention chat service (Preprint)
2025 · cited by 0
Recognizes emotional reasoning as a specific type of cognitive distortion.
OpenAIRE: Prevalence of Cognitive Distortion Markers in a Suicide Prevention Chat Service: Mixed Methods Study
2026 · cited by 0
Classifies emotional reasoning as a distinct cognitive distortion type.
Everything we examined (15) — 11 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Wikipedia: Emotional reasoningreferencesupports
  2. Book: Parent-child Relationsreferencesupports
  3. Book: Handbook of Evidence-based Psychotherapiesreferencesame source L3supports
  4. Book: Disorders of Personalityreferencesame source L3no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. Book: Developments in Cognitive Psychotherapyreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Book: Rational-Emotive Approaches to the Problems of Childhoodreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Wikisource: Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Processreferencesame source L6no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Wikisource: Psychology of Beautyreferencesame source L6no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Wikisource: Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Trial Judgment)referencesame source L6no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. OpenAIRE: Prevalence of cognitive distortion markers in a suicide prevention chat service (Preprint)peer-reviewedsame source L7supports
  11. OpenAIRE: Prevalence of Cognitive Distortion Markers in a Suicide Prevention Chat Service: Mixed Methods Studypeer-reviewedsame source L7supports
  12. OpenAIRE: The Thurmondian Model of Consciousness: A Tripartite, Substrate-Agnostic Frameworkpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  13. OpenAIRE: Philosophy after Philosophy: Quantified, Executed, and Echoedpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  14. OpenAIRE: MAHMF Curvature as Cognition: Toward a Recursive Substrate for Living AIpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  15. OpenAIRE: A Mechanistic Conditioning Model of Feeling and Qualia — and — Understanding, Agency, and Ethics: A Unified SANER-MROS Frameworkpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7506 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt