trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Emotional reasoning is a distinct cognitive distortion pattern

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that emotional reasoning is a distinct cognitive distortion pattern?

Yes. Psychological literature and reference texts establish that emotional reasoning is a recognized and distinct cognitive distortion.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 5
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Emotional reasoning. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_reasoning

See more details
More for · 4
1994
Identifies emotional reasoning as a distorted thinking pattern.
Get citation
Bigner, J. J. (1994). Book: Parent-child Relations. Macmillan College. http://books.google.com/books?id=-RwEAQAAIAAJ&dq=Emotional+reasoning+is+a+distinct+cognitive+distortion+pattern&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

2007
Lists emotional reasoning among cognitive distortions.
Get citation
Freeman, C. & Power, M. J. (2007). Book: Handbook of Evidence-based Psychotherapies. John Wiley & Sons. http://books.google.com/books?id=pRIpAAAAYAAJ&dq=Emotional+reasoning+is+a+distinct+cognitive+distortion+pattern&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

2025
Recognizes emotional reasoning as a specific type of cognitive distortion.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Prevalence of cognitive distortion markers in a suicide prevention chat service (Preprint). (2025). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.81213

2026
Classifies emotional reasoning as a distinct cognitive distortion type.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Prevalence of Cognitive Distortion Markers in a Suicide Prevention Chat Service: Mixed Methods Study. (2026). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.2196/81213

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7506 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work