trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Duck quacks do not echo

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Is it true that Duck quacks do not echo?

No. Fact-checkers have thoroughly debunked the urban legend that duck quacks do not echo. Duck quacks do indeed echo, though acoustic conditions can sometimes make the echo difficult to perceive.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

How claims like this are judged

Judged against fact-checker rulings and reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the fact-checking record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence against · 2
Fact-checker ruling: False
Get citation
Snopes: Duck's Quacks Don't Echo?. (n.d.). Snopes. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ducking-the-question/

See more details
More against · 1
Fact-checker ruling: False
Get citation
PolitiFact: A duck's quack echoes — but you might not hear it. (n.d.). PolitiFact. https://politifact.com/factchecks/2019/sep/10/viral-image/ducks-quack-echoes-you-might-not-hear-it/

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1005 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work