trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Descartes argued God could alter mathematical truths but not laws of nature.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Descartes argued God could alter mathematical truths but not laws of nature?

Yes. Descartes maintained that God freely created the eternal truths (such as mathematics) and could have made them otherwise, whereas the laws of nature are grounded in God's immutable nature and steadfast will.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Evidence for · 3
2017
Paper establishes that Descartes argued God creates and can alter the eternal truths, including mathematics.
Get citation
Macbeth, D. (2017). Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.11590/ABHPS.2017.1.01

See more details
More for · 2
2013
Paper discusses how Descartes held that the laws of nature follow from God's immutability rather than being arbitrarily alterable by divine will in the same manner.
Get citation
Garber, D. (2013). God, Laws, and the Order of Nature. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199934409.003.0003

2001
Paper connects Descartes's creation of eternal truths with his later physics concerning the immutability-grounded laws of nature.
Get citation
Devillairs, L. (2001). L'immutabilité divine comme fondement des lois de la nature chez Descartes et les éléments de la critique leibnizienne / Divine immutability as the foundation of nature laws in Descartes and the arguments involved in Leibniz's criticism. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.3406/rhs.2001.2126

What does the evidence say?

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Receipt History
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8506 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work