trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Crucial psychological discoveries rely exclusively on experiments using non-human animals

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that crucial psychological discoveries rely exclusively on experiments using non-human animals?

No. The claim that crucial psychological discoveries rely exclusively on non-human animal experiments is demonstrably false, as major foundational areas such as cognitive psychology, behavioral finance, health psychology, and behavioral economics are derived from human studies.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim asserts an absolute exclusivity ("rely exclusively on experiments using non-human animals") for crucial psychological discoveries. Multiple retrieved papers describe psychological and behavioral research conducted entirely with human subjects, such as behavioral finance [5], clinical risk assessment [6], behavioral medicine [9], and consumer decision-making [11]. Because major psychological domains and discoveries are established through human research, the claim is refuted.

Evidence against · 4
Theoretical Aspects of Behavioral Finance Research
2025
Get citation
Zadorozhnia, L. (2025). Theoretical Aspects of Behavioral Finance Research. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.32515/2663-1636.2025.13(46).1.154-165

See more details
More against · 3
Human Experts and AI Models in Offender Risk Assessment: A Comparative Pilot Study Using the HCR-20V3.
2026
Get citation
S, F. (2026). Human Experts and AI Models in Offender Risk Assessment: A Comparative Pilot Study Using the HCR-20V3.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70023

PRINCIPALES APORTACIONES A LA MEDICINA CONDUCTUAL DE JOSEPH DOMINIC MATARAZZO MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE BY JOSEPH DOMINIC MATARAZZO
2012
Get citation
Cerezo-Reséndiz, S. & Hurtado-Rodríguez, C. (2012). PRINCIPALES APORTACIONES A LA MEDICINA CONDUCTUAL DE JOSEPH DOMINIC MATARAZZO MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE BY JOSEPH DOMINIC MATARAZZO. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesi.20070780.2011.3.2.30218

Measurement and Modeling of Sustainable Food Choice and Purchasing Behavior: A Systematic Review of Methods and Models.
2026
Get citation
TN, A. & HMA, B. (2026). Measurement and Modeling of Sustainable Food Choice and Purchasing Behavior: A Systematic Review of Methods and Models.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15081442

What does the evidence say?

The claim asserts an absolute exclusivity ("rely exclusively on experiments using non-human animals") for crucial psychological discoveries. Multiple retrieved papers describe psychological and behavioral research conducted entirely with human subjects, such as behavioral finance [5], clinical risk assessment [6], behavioral medicine [9], and consumer decision-making [11]. Because major psychological domains and discoveries are established through human research, the claim is refuted.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 404 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work