trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Cosmetic regulations require listing purified water under the INCI term Aqua on shampoo labels.

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that cosmetic regulations require listing purified water under the INCI term Aqua on shampoo labels?

Water is universally designated by the INCI term Aqua on cosmetic ingredient labels, a fact confirmed by standard regulatory naming conventions that does not require citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is a straightforward matter of standard industry definitions and regulatory nomenclature (INCI names for cosmetics, where water is designated as Aqua), representing common knowledge in cosmetic chemistry that does not require academic study verification.

What does the evidence say?

The claim is a straightforward matter of standard industry definitions and regulatory nomenclature (INCI names for cosmetics, where water is designated as Aqua), representing common knowledge in cosmetic chemistry that does not require academic study verification.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work