trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Confusion is classified as a distinct epistemic emotion.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
7 sources for · 0 against

Confusion is widely recognized in educational psychology and cognitive research as a distinct epistemic emotion—an affective state directly tied to knowledge acquisition, cognitive incongruity, and information processing.

Evidence for · 7
2019 · cited by 18
Paper 0 examines epistemic emotions, specifically grouping surprise, curiosity, and confusion as distinct epistemic emotions related to knowledge generation.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved literature consistently treats confusion as an epistemic emotion alongside surprise and curiosity, examining its role in learning, cognitive imbalance, and knowledge exploration. No papers refute this classification.

More for · 6
2024 · cited by 5
Paper 4 identifies epistemic confusion as a key epistemic emotion that helps students navigate science inquiry and conceptual understanding.
2025 · cited by 4
Paper 5 discusses viewers' epistemic emotions, explicitly categorizing confusion and interest as affective states that regulate information processing during narrative engagement.
2022 · cited by 3
Paper 6 investigates epistemic confusion as a distinct affective state arising in complex learning situations and cognitive imbalances.
2025 · cited by 3
Paper 7 measures the epistemic emotions of surprise, confusion, and curiosity in response to feedback on high-confidence errors.
2024 · cited by 1
Paper 10 utilizes Epistemic Emotions Scales to measure specific epistemic emotions including confusion following cognitive tasks.
2026 · cited by 1
Paper 11 analyzes epistemic emotions like curiosity, surprise, and confusion as direct components of knowledge-related learning processes.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8304 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt