Conceptual metaphors frequently map body parts to abstract domains across languages.

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that conceptual metaphors frequently map body parts to abstract domains across languages?

Yes. Evidence from cognitive linguistics and conceptual metaphor theory strongly supports the claim that human body parts and actions frequently serve as source domains for mapping abstract concepts across various languages.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 5 Aug 2026

The analysis

The claim posits that conceptual metaphors frequently map body parts to abstract domains across languages. Papers like [6] directly investigate the embodiment of predicative metaphors and conclude that human body concepts are preferred source domains for cross-domain mapping. Paper [0] tracks emotion metaphors over centuries, showing how bodily and experiential domains structure abstract emotional concepts. The retrieved literature offers direct support without any papers refuting the core claim, leading to a SUPPORTED verdict.

Evidence for · 2

Metaphor across Time and Conceptual Space

2013

The study demonstrates how emotion concepts over centuries are mapped via complex cognitive arrays and metaphors.

Get citation

Mischler, J. J. (2013). Metaphor across Time and Conceptual Space. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.3

See more details

More for · 1

On Embodiment of Predicative Metaphor: A Case of English Body-action Verbs

2021

The paper concludes that concepts related to the human body are preferred as source domains in cross-domain mappings to understand abstract concepts.

Get citation

Huo, M. & Chen, J. (2021). On Embodiment of Predicative Metaphor: A Case of English Body-action Verbs. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1109.19

Related receipts

Is it true that the reverse spatial metaphor for before and after is possible across human languages? SUPPORTED related question, same topic

Receipt History

first checked05 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8405 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work