trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Conceptual metaphors frequently map body parts to abstract domains across languages.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Evidence from cognitive linguistics and conceptual metaphor theory strongly supports the claim that human body parts and actions frequently serve as source domains for mapping abstract concepts across various languages.

Evidence for · 2
2013 · cited by 23
The study demonstrates how emotion concepts over centuries are mapped via complex cognitive arrays and metaphors.
See more details
The analysis

The claim posits that conceptual metaphors frequently map body parts to abstract domains across languages. Papers like [6] directly investigate the embodiment of predicative metaphors and conclude that human body concepts are preferred source domains for cross-domain mapping. Paper [0] tracks emotion metaphors over centuries, showing how bodily and experiential domains structure abstract emotional concepts. The retrieved literature offers direct support without any papers refuting the core claim, leading to a SUPPORTED verdict.

More for · 1
2021 · cited by 2
The paper concludes that concepts related to the human body are preferred as source domains in cross-domain mappings to understand abstract concepts.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8405 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt