trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Comprehensive data repositories of organic compounds include PubChem and the Cambridge Structural Database.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that comprehensive data repositories of organic compounds include PubChem and the Cambridge Structural Database?

Yes. PubChem and the Cambridge Structural Database are well-documented comprehensive repositories for chemical and structural data on organic compounds.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently describe both PubChem and the Cambridge Structural Database as major, comprehensive repositories containing extensive data on chemical compounds and crystal structures.

Evidence for · 4
2016
Get citation
Groom, C., Bruno, I., Lightfoot, M., & Ward, S. (2016). The Cambridge Structural Database. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520616003954

See more details
More for · 3
2015
Get citation
Kim, S., Thiessen, P., Bolton, E. E., Chen, J., Fu, G., Gindulyte, A., Han, L., He, J., He, S., Shoemaker, B. A., Wang, J., Yu, B., Zhang, J., & Bryant, S. (2015). PubChem Substance and Compound databases. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv951

2019
Get citation
Cole, J. C., Wiggin, S., & Stanzione, F. (2019). New insights and innovation from a million crystal structures in the Cambridge Structural Database. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5116878

2025
Get citation
G, G. & JL, F. (2025). BioRGroup dataset: R-group expansion of ChEBI molecules referenced in the Rhea database.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05983-w

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers consistently describe both PubChem and the Cambridge Structural Database as major, comprehensive repositories containing extensive data on chemical compounds and crystal structures.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 9804 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work