trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Cognitive science research has investigated the experiences of animals in captivity

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that cognitive science research has investigated the experiences of animals in captivity?

Yes. Multiple studies demonstrate that cognitive science research actively investigates the behavioral and cognitive experiences, needs, and welfare of various animals in captivity.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states that cognitive science research has investigated the experiences of animals in captivity. Papers [0], [1], [2], [5], and [7] directly discuss and review cognitive research involving captive animals (such as farm livestock, fish, and other vertebrates), examining how captivity affects their cognitive abilities, behavioral needs, and welfare. There are no papers refuting this claim, and the retrieved evidence robustly supports it.

Evidence for · 5
2019
This review highlights how cognitive research investigates farm animal perception, needs, and capacities in captive environments.
Get citation
Nawroth, C., Langbein, J., Coulon, M., Gabor, V., Oesterwind, S., Benz-Schwarzburg, J., & borell, E. V. (2019). Farm Animal Cognition—Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00024

See more details
More for · 4
2023
The paper reviews how captivity and environmental conditions affect the brain, cognition, and behavior of vertebrates.
Get citation
Clark, F., Greggor, A., Montgomery, S., & Plotnik, J. M. (2023). The endangered brain: actively preserving ex-situ animal behaviour and cognition will benefit in-situ conservation. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230707

2025
This study evaluates avian cognition, emotional states, and sensory perception to improve welfare in intensive farming.
Get citation
Neethirajan, S. (2025). Rethinking Poultry Welfare—Integrating Behavioral Science and Digital Innovations for Enhanced Animal Well-Being. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4020020

2026
This research compares cognitive and behavioral performance between long-term captive and newly caught fish to understand the impacts of captivity conditions.
Get citation
J, C., NAR, J., & C, N. (2026). Differential captivity and experiential conditions and its impact on the behaviour and cognition of Picasso triggerfish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus).. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-026-02057-1

2025
This review examines how cognitive processes and mental capabilities influence farm animal welfare and adaptation to surroundings in captivity.
Get citation
Arya, A., Trivedi, M., Patel, Y. G., & Lunagariya, P. (2025). Animal Cognition and Animal Welfare: A Review. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.r-2726

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8804 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work