trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Centrioles actively auto-locate to opposite sides of the cell during mitosis

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
1 source for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Centrioles actively auto-locate to opposite sides of the cell during mitosis?

No. Centrioles do not actively auto-locate to opposite sides of the cell by themselves; rather, motor proteins (such as kinesins) actively push them along microtubules.

Verdict: REFUTED · 1 source for, 2 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Evidence for · 1
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Centriole. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centriole

Evidence against · 2
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Mitosis. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitosis

See more details
More against · 1
2014
Shows that kinesin-5 (motor proteins) mediates centrosome separation, disproving auto-location.
Get citation
Joukov, V., Walter, J., & Nicolo, A. D. (2014). The Cep192-organized Aurora A-Plk1 cascade is essential for centrosome cycle and bipolar spindle assembly. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.016

What does the evidence say?

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 2605 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work