trustmebro.to/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Black hole complementarity resolves the paradox of Hawking radiation absorption

the verdict

CONTESTED

contested - the weight sits with the refuting side

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that black hole complementarity resolves the paradox of Hawking radiation absorption?

Partly. Whether black hole complementarity successfully resolves the paradox of Hawking radiation absorption and information loss remains a highly contested subject in theoretical physics, particularly in light of challenges like the firewall puzzle.

Verdict: CONTESTED · 2 sources for, 3 against · Last checked 4 Aug 2026

The analysis

The retrieved papers show active division in the physics community regarding black hole complementarity. While some early formulations and backreaction arguments suggest complementarity could suffice (Papers 0, 3), others emphasize its limitations, such as the AMPS firewall puzzle and challenges from quantum tunneling and global descriptions (Papers 0, 2, 4). Thus, the verdict is CONTESTED.

The evidence we hold leans leans refuted

How this was weighed

official record 3x · fact-check 2x · hedged 1x · crowd & reference 1x

The Black Hole Information Problem · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.6 · 2016
Complementarity plus backreaction is enough · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.3 · 2013
The Black Hole Information Problem · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.6 · 2016
Causal Patch Complementarity: The Inside Story for Old Black · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.3 · 2013
Black Hole Paradoxes · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.05 · 2004

Evidence for · 2

The Black Hole Information Problem

2016

Black hole complementarity historically offered a partial framework to address aspects of the black hole information problem.

Get citation

Polchinski, J. (2016). The Black Hole Information Problem. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813149441_0006

Evidence against · 3

The Black Hole Information Problem

2016

Recent developments such as the firewall puzzle show that black hole complementarity faces severe limitations and may be insufficient.

Get citation

Polchinski, J. (2016). The Black Hole Information Problem. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813149441_0006

See more details

More for · 1

Complementarity plus backreaction is enough

2013

Complementarity combined with proper accounting of gravitational backreaction has been argued to resolve practical paradoxes without new physics.

Get citation

Hui, L. & Yang, I. (2013). Complementarity plus backreaction is enough. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084011

More against · 2

Causal Patch Complementarity: The Inside Story for Old Black Holes

2013

The AMPS paradox challenges complementarity by demonstrating that maintaining entanglement across the horizon leads to contradictions unless distillation processes are restricted.

Get citation

Ilgin, I. & Yang, I. (2013). Causal Patch Complementarity: The Inside Story for Old Black Holes. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.044007

Black Hole Paradoxes

2004

Black hole complementarity itself has been challenged by gravitational tunneling radiation and ongoing debates regarding the loss of information.

Get citation

Rabinowitz, M. (2004). Black Hole Paradoxes..

Related receipts

Is it true that Hawking radiation of a charged black hole is strictly thermal? REFUTED related question, same topic
Is it true that black holes can theoretically explode via Hawking radiation? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that Hawking radiation originates just outside the event horizon of a black hole? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that larger black holes emit less Hawking radiation than smaller black holes? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that Hawking radiation causes black holes to lose mass and eventually evaporate? SUPPORTED related question, same topic
Is it true that the information paradox is a real problem for black holes? PARTIAL LEAN related question, same topic

Receipt History

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → CONTESTED · 2804 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work