trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Bioinformatic tools like KEGG and MetaCyc can identify enzyme actions in metabolic pathways.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Bioinformatic tools like KEGG and MetaCyc can identify enzyme actions in metabolic pathways?

Yes. Bioinformatic tools and databases such as KEGG and MetaCyc are widely utilized and documented in scientific literature for identifying enzyme actions and metabolic pathways.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently demonstrate that KEGG and MetaCyc are primary bioinformatic databases and tools used by researchers to identify, reconstruct, and analyze metabolic pathways and enzyme actions across various organisms. Therefore, the claim is fully supported by the available evidence.

Evidence for · 5
A systematic comparison of the MetaCyc and KEGG pathway databases
2013
Paper compares the compound, reaction, and pathway content of MetaCyc and KEGG, demonstrating their use in identifying metabolic pathways and reactions.
Get citation
Altman, T., Travers, M., Kothari, A., Caspi, R., & Karp, P. D. (2013). A systematic comparison of the MetaCyc and KEGG pathway databases. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-112

See more details
More for · 4
A Multi-Omics Analysis Pipeline for the Metabolic Pathway Reconstruction in the Orphan Species Quercus ilex
2018
Paper uses the KEGG database to identify and visualize 123 metabolic pathways in the Holm oak genome.
Get citation
López-Hidalgo, C., Guerrero-Sánchez, V. M., Gómez-Gálvez, I., Sanchez-Lucas, R., Castillejo-Sánchez, M. A., Maldonado-Alconada, A. M., Valledor, L., & Jorrín-Novo, J. (2018). A Multi-Omics Analysis Pipeline for the Metabolic Pathway Reconstruction in the Orphan Species Quercus ilex. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00935

Prediction of trehalose-metabolic pathway and comparative analysis of KEGG, MetaCyc, and RAST databases based on complete genome of Variovorax sp. PAMC28711
2022
Paper uses KEGG and MetaCyc databases to deduce and identify the trehalose metabolic network and its enzymes.
Get citation
Shrestha, P., Kim, M., Elbasani, E., Kim, J., & Oh, T. (2022). Prediction of trehalose-metabolic pathway and comparative analysis of KEGG, MetaCyc, and RAST databases based on complete genome of Variovorax sp. PAMC28711. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-021-01020-y

Chemical representation standardization needed to generalize metabolic pathway involvement prediction across the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Reactome, and MetaCyc knowledgebases
2025
Paper notes that knowledgebases like KEGG and MetaCyc aggregate pathway and compound annotations to identify pathway involvement.
Get citation
Huckvale, E. D. & Moseley, H. (2025). Chemical representation standardization needed to generalize metabolic pathway involvement prediction across the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Reactome, and MetaCyc knowledgebases. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.02.646918

Inulin supplementation increases the differential metabolites and metabolic pathway in Baird's tapirs (Tapirus bairdii)
2023
Paper utilizes KEGG annotation to identify differential metabolites and analyze metabolic pathways in Baird's tapirs.
Get citation
Liu, H., Liu, Y., Hao, F., Li, B., & Cong, Y. (2023). Inulin supplementation increases the differential metabolites and metabolic pathway in Baird's tapirs (Tapirus bairdii). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1260

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved papers consistently demonstrate that KEGG and MetaCyc are primary bioinformatic databases and tools used by researchers to identify, reconstruct, and analyze metabolic pathways and enzyme actions across various organisms. Therefore, the claim is fully supported by the available evidence.

Receipt History
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8806 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work