trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Atomic orbitals are not spherically symmetric when the magnetic quantum number is non-zero

the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
Legacy classification; evidence review pending
Recorded sources
no sources on either side

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that atomic orbitals are not spherically symmetric when the magnetic quantum number is non-zero?

This is a fundamental and well-established principle of quantum mechanics regarding the angular dependence of atomic orbitals, requiring no citation.

Verdict: COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 0 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim states that atomic orbitals are not spherically symmetric when the magnetic quantum number is non-zero (i.e., m is not equal to zero, such as in p_x, p_y, or d-orbitals which feature nodal planes or lobes breaking spherical symmetry). This is a foundational, axiomatic fact of quantum chemistry and atomic physics found in every introductory textbook, making it common knowledge by direct definition of spherical harmonics. None of the retrieved papers are targeted at verifying or contesting this textbook fact; they are specialized studies on unrelated topics such as fullerenes, topological semimetals, and high-harmonic generation.

What does the evidence say?

The claim states that atomic orbitals are not spherically symmetric when the magnetic quantum number is non-zero (i.e., m is not equal to zero, such as in p_x, p_y, or d-orbitals which feature nodal planes or lobes breaking spherical symmetry). This is a foundational, axiomatic fact of quantum chemistry and atomic physics found in every introductory textbook, making it common knowledge by direct definition of spherical harmonics. None of the retrieved papers are targeted at verifying or contesting this textbook fact; they are specialized studies on unrelated topics such as fullerenes, topological semimetals, and high-harmonic generation.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work