trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Asking an author you are reviewing to cite your work is a conflict of interest

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that asking an author you are reviewing to cite your work is a conflict of interest?

Yes. Evidence from peer-review literature confirms that a reviewer asking authors to cite their work is a coercive practice and a conflict of interest that compromises the integrity of the peer-review process.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Evidence for · 3
2013
The paper identifies coercive citation by reviewers and editors as a serious breach of research integrity designed to manipulate citation metrics.
Get citation
Martin, B. (2013). Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2013.03.011

See more details
More for · 2
2026
The paper explicitly highlights coercive citation practices by reviewers as a form of peer review abuse that undermines the trustworthiness of scientific literature.
Get citation
Dore, M. P., Merola, E., Lasaracina, G., & Pes, G. (2026). Artificial Intelligence as a Safeguard for Clinical Scientific Integrity: A Human–AI Hybrid Model for Medical Peer Review. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062215

2025
The empirical study demonstrates that peer reviewers requesting citations to their own work can turn peer review into a transactional conflict of interest.
Get citation
A, B. (2025). Are peer reviewers influenced by their work being cited?. peer-reviewed literature. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.108748

What does the evidence say?

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8805 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work