Archaea possess functional equivalents to antibiotic resistance markers for selection
Is it true that archaea possess functional equivalents to antibiotic resistance markers for selection?
Yes. Studies on archaeal genetics document the development and use of selection systems, including auxotrophic complementation and antibiotic-based markers, to facilitate genetic manipulation in various archaeal species.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Several papers discuss genetic systems in archaea that rely on selection and counterselection markers, including nutritional markers (like pyrE) and antibiotic sensitivity profiles used for selection. The retrieved literature clearly supports the premise that selectable markers are functional and utilized in archaeal genetic engineering.
Get citation
T, M., T, M., & CM, D. (2024). Teaching old dogs new tricks: genetic engineering methanogens.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02247-23
See more details
Get citation
C, T., J, N., AMC, S., T, H., N, D. C., A, M., & TEF, Q. (2024). Development of a genetic system for <i>Haloferax gibbonsii</i> LR2-5, model host for haloarchaeal viruses.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00129-24
Get citation
T, K., LH, H., M, D., JC, M., MI, H., C, S., & LE, L. (2025). Distinct Patterns of Antibiotic Sensitivities in Ammonia-Oxidising Archaea.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.70063
What does the evidence say?
Several papers discuss genetic systems in archaea that rely on selection and counterselection markers, including nutritional markers (like pyrE) and antibiotic sensitivity profiles used for selection. The retrieved literature clearly supports the premise that selectable markers are functional and utilized in archaeal genetic engineering.
Receipt History
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work