trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Ants are entirely blind.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that ants are entirely blind?

No. The claim that ants are entirely blind is directly refuted by scientific evidence showing that most ants possess functional eyes, utilize vision for foraging and navigation, and exhibit visual-motion responses.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The analysis

The claim is specific and empirical, thus passing Step 0. The retrieved literature clearly contradicts the idea that ants are blind, noting that ants use vision for foraging (one study) and possess visual processing systems that drive behaviors such as the optomotor response (one study).

Evidence against · 2
2025
Get citation
A, D., J, O., X, C., F, A., B, C., & A, T. (2025). Foraging by predatory ants: A review.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13461

See more details
More against · 1
2026
Get citation
O, D., S, D. W., & A, W. (2026). Predictive coding and oscillations underlie the optomotor response in distant insect lineages. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.01.708750

Related receipts
Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work