Angiography is clinically indicated in stable angina patients under specific conditions

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Angiography is clinically indicated in stable angina patients under specific conditions?

Yes. Angiography is indeed indicated in stable angina patients under specific conditions, such as when clinical risk models or international guidelines establish a high pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked 4 Aug 2026

The analysis

The retrieved literature consistently supports the claim that invasive coronary angiography in stable angina or chronic coronary syndromes is guided by specific clinical indications, risk models, and international guidelines rather than being used indiscriminately. Papers 0, 2, and 9 specifically discuss the tailored selection criteria, pre-test probability models, and guideline recommendations that govern when angiography is clinically indicated for stable patients.

Evidence for · 3

[ISCHEMIA - the Largest Ever R andomized Study in Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Baseline Characteristics of Enrolled Patients in One Russian Site].

2017

Get citation

Sayganov, S., Bershteyn, L. L., Andreeva, A., Katamadze, N., Zbyshevskaya, E., Kuzmina-Krutetskaya, A. M., Volkov, A., Gumerova, V., & Bitakova, F. I. (2017). [ISCHEMIA - the Largest Ever R andomized Study in Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Baseline Characteristics of Enrolled Patients in One Russian Site].. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.18087/CARDIO.2017.10.10038

See more details

More for · 2

Great debate: the new risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood model is useful to estimate the initial pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease in individuals with suspected chronic coronary syndromes.

2026

Get citation

F, A., H, T., H, T., C, V., A, J., S, W., J, G., D, C., S, D., S, N., & DA, G. (2026). Great debate: the new risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood model is useful to estimate the initial pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease in individuals with suspected chronic coronary syndromes.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag091

Reducing unwarranted variation in low-value health care in Norway: description of the NOR programme.

2026

Get citation

O, T., C, D., H, L., KAL, N., C, T., B, B., A, K., KM, A., LS, G., E, P., M, H., & E, S. (2026). Reducing unwarranted variation in low-value health care in Norway: description of the NOR programme.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43999-026-00089-1

Related receipts

Is it true that patients with angina have a high risk of mortality? PARTIAL LEAN related question, same topic

Receipt History

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8104 Aug 2026

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work