trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
American sanctuary cities breed crime
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 3 against

Empirical studies consistently find that the adoption of sanctuary city policies does not increase crime rates or threaten public safety.

Evidence against · 3
2017 · cited by 42
This literature review finds either a null or negative relationship between sanctuary policies and crime rates.
See more details
The analysis

The provided research papers (such as Martinez et al., 2017; Wong, 2020; and Chiricos et al., 2023) directly test the claim that sanctuary policies increase crime and find no evidence supporting it, reporting instead a null or non-significant relationship. Therefore, the claim is refuted by the available empirical evidence.

More against · 2
2020 · cited by 11
This empirical study evaluates ICE and FBI data and concludes that sanctuary policies do not have any detectable effect on crime rates.
2023 · cited by 8
This study finds that anti-detainer policies (sanctuary policies) show no significant impact on violent victimization risk.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1004 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt