trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

According to Aquinas, a bodily being's substantial form relates directly to its act of existing

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Is it true that according to Aquinas, a bodily being's substantial form relates directly to its act of existing?

Yes. According to Thomas Aquinas's hylomorphic philosophy, bodily beings are composites of matter and substantial form, where the substantial form organizes matter and relates directly to the entity's existence.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 3
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Thomas Aquinas. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Aquinas

See more details
More for · 2
Reference article covering this claim directly
Get citation
Wikipedia: Substantial form. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_form

Confirms a substance is a compound of a substantial form and matter.
Get citation
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Form vs. Matter. (n.d.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/form-matter/

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7504 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work