trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

A pendulum's period is independent of its amplitude

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that a pendulum's period is independent of its amplitude?

No. The claim that a pendulum's period is independent of its amplitude is incorrect. In reality, a pendulum's period depends on its amplitude, a dependence that becomes increasingly pronounced at larger angles.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved literature consistently shows that a pendulum's period varies with its amplitude, particularly outside the small-angle approximation where nonlinear effects require elliptic integrals or specialized approximations. Therefore, the claim is refuted.

Evidence against · 4
2005
The paper derives formulas demonstrating that a pendulum's period depends on its amplitude outside the small angle regime.
Get citation
Lima, F. & Arun, P. (2005). An accurate formula for the period of a simple pendulum oscillating beyond the small angle regime. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2215616

See more details
More against · 3
2020
The paper reviews approximate equations for measuring the pendulum period as a function of amplitude.
Get citation
Hinrichsen, P. (2020). Review of approximate equations for the pendulum period. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/abad10

2023
The paper develops formulas for calculating the period of a large-angle pendulum, confirming amplitude dependence.
Get citation
Big‐Alabo, A. (2023). Fifth-order AGM-formula for the period of a large-angle pendulum. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2023-0014

2024
The paper uses elliptic integrals to account for the nonlinearity and period change of a pendulum at different amplitudes.
Get citation
Ohno, M. & Kotake, S. (2024). Operating Time Modification by Elliptic Integration in Feedforward Control of One-Time Swing-Up Pendulum Using Finite-Time Settling Functions with Half-Odd-Integer Trigonometric Functions. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1109/ONCON62778.2024.10931282

Related receipts

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved literature consistently shows that a pendulum's period varies with its amplitude, particularly outside the small-angle approximation where nonlinear effects require elliptic integrals or specialized approximations. Therefore, the claim is refuted.

Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1205 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work