✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
A pattern constitutes a real ontological entity.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that a pattern constitutes a real ontological entity?
Yes. Philosophical frameworks such as Daniel Dennett's 'Real Patterns' and ontic structural realism argue that relational patterns constitute real entities within our cosmos.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
The analysis
Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.
Evidence for · 3
Examines Daniel Dennett's philosophical work arguing that real patterns constitute real entities.
Get citation
Millhouse, T., Petersen, S. D., & Ross, D. (2026). Book: Dennett's Real Patterns in Science and Nature. MIT Press. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=HWdtEQAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api
See more details
More for · 2
Proposes ontic structural patternism, arguing that reality is fundamentally composed of relational patterns.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: RELATIONAL PATTERNIST SYNTHESIS: Ontology, Semiotics, and Structural Realism. (2026). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19481107
Models reality as emergent from recursive phase coherence and pattern formation.
Get citation
OpenAIRE: Recognition as Fundamental: Phase-Coherent Dynamics Across Physics, Consciousness, and Artificial Intelligence. (2025). OpenAIRE. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15813513
What does the evidence say?
Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.
Receipt History
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7505 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work