trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
A Kerr black hole can evolve to become super-extremal
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 5 against

Physical theories and tests of the weak cosmic censorship conjecture generally indicate that a Kerr black hole cannot evolve to become super-extremal (exceeding the maximum angular momentum limit relative to its mass).

Evidence against · 5
2018 · cited by 77
Demonstrates that Kerr-type black holes cannot exceed the extremal condition and thus remain bounded under scalar field scattering, upholding cosmic censorship.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved literature consistently supports the validity of the weak cosmic censorship conjecture, showing that extremal or near-extremal Kerr black holes cannot be driven past the extremal limit by incoming matter, fields, or particles when accounting for thermodynamic and backreaction constraints.

More against · 4
2019 · cited by 37
Shows that while certain extreme collisions in higher dimensions can violate cosmic censorship, standard astrophysical models and conservation laws prevent super-extremal evolution in standard frameworks.
2019 · cited by 30
Indicates that cosmic censorship prevents black holes from evolving beyond the extremal limit in standard dimensions.
2018 · cited by 20
Finds that extremal black holes cannot be over-spun or overcharged beyond the extremal condition when thermodynamic laws are properly respected.
2023 · cited by 16
Proves that extremal black holes cannot be destroyed or driven past their limits by test particles or fields.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1204 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt