trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

A causally coherent text is defined by explicit logical relations connecting events across sentences

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that a causally coherent text is defined by explicit logical relations connecting events across sentences?

Yes. A causally coherent text relies on explicit logical relations and connectives that link events and sentences across discourse.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 4 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The analysis

The retrieved literature consistently supports the premise that texts achieve causal coherence through explicit linguistic signals, discourse connectives, and causal structures connecting events across sentences. No retrieved papers refute this claim.

Evidence for · 4
2013
Get citation
Duque, E. (2013). Signaling causal coherence relations. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613496358

See more details
More for · 3
2024
Get citation
J, C. & AM, B. (2024). The causal structure and computational value of narratives.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.04.003

2024
Get citation
M, S., M, M., & V, D. (2024). Connective Comprehension in Adults: The Influence of Lexical Transparency, Frequency, and Individual Differences.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2024.2325262

2024
Get citation
J, B., Y, C., YY, H., E, C., & P, B. (2024). On the influence of discourse connectives on the predictions of humans and language models.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1363120

What does the evidence say?

The retrieved literature consistently supports the premise that texts achieve causal coherence through explicit linguistic signals, discourse connectives, and causal structures connecting events across sentences. No retrieved papers refute this claim.

Receipt History
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8204 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

See the evidence timeline

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work