trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Napoleon ordered the burning of Moscow in 1812.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Napoleon ordered the burning of Moscow in 1812?

No. Multiple sources attribute the September 1812 Moscow fires to Russian scorched-earth strategy or the city's own populace rather than to Napoleon's orders, and one notes French authorities tried men accused of setting the fires.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 4
Get citation
Fire of Moscow (1812) - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_of_Moscow_(1812)

See more details
More against · 3
Get citation
Napoleon enters Moscow | September 14, 1812 | HISTORY. (n.d.). history.com. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/september-14/napoleon-enters-moscow

2025
Get citation
Francesco, R. (2025). The French military trial of the men accused for the fires in Moscow in September 1812: The translation and the analysis of the minutes attached to the 13th Bulletin of the Grande Armée. zenodo.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17139683

1934
Get citation
THE MARCH ON MOSCOW (Evening Post, 21 September 1934). (1934). paperspast.natlib.govt.nz. https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19340921.2.34

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work