trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Topical retinol reduces the appearance of stretch marks.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that topical retinol reduces the appearance of stretch marks?

Partly. Evidence on retinoids for stretch marks is mixed and indirect: several sources report tretinoin (a retinoid, not retinol) improves the appearance of early stretch marks, while a systematic review found tretinoin results varied and no topical formulation is shown most effective. No retrieved source directly tests topical retinol on stretch marks.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 3 sources for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Stretch marks. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stretch_marks

Evidence against · 1
2016
Get citation
S, U., D, M., & A, B. (2016). Topical management of striae distensae (stretch marks): prevention and therapy of striae rubrae and albae.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13223

See more details
More for · 2
2025
Get citation
Rosell, V. M. C. & Grimalt, R. (2025). Dual Topical Therapy. The Future of Stretch Marks?. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.70234

2015
Get citation
Korgavkar, K. & Wang, F. (2015). Stretch marks during pregnancy: a review of topical prevention.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13426

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work