trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Self-driving cars have lower crash rates per mile driven than human-driven cars.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Self-driving cars have lower crash rates per mile driven than human-driven cars?

Unclear. Two items report that Google's self-driving test cars had a lower police-reportable crash rate per million miles than human drivers in Mountain View, California, during 2009-2015, though the difference was not statistically significant. This covers only one test program in one city over one period, not self-driving cars generally.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers
2017
Get citation
Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers. (2017). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.008

See more details
More for · 1
A matched case-control analysis of autonomous vs human-driven vehicle accidents | Nature CommunicationsClose bannerClose banner
Get citation
A matched case-control analysis of autonomous vs human-driven vehicle accidents | Nature CommunicationsClose bannerClose banner. (n.d.). nature.com. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-48526-4

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work