trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

DeepSeek language models hallucinate more often than other leading language models.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that DeepSeek language models hallucinate more often than other leading language models?

Unclear. Two studies report that DeepSeek models hallucinate in medical reasoning and archival tasks, but neither compares DeepSeek's hallucination rate against other leading language models, so the comparative claim is not established.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 2 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
Limitations of large language models in clinical problem-solving arising from inflexible reasoning
2025
Get citation
Kim, J., Podlasek, A., Shidara, K., Liu, F., Alaa, A., & Bernardo, D. (2025). Limitations of large language models in clinical problem-solving arising from inflexible reasoning. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22940-0

See more details
More for · 1
Large Language Models are not a One-Size-Fit All Solution for Archives and Records Management
2026
Get citation
Large Language Models are not a One-Size-Fit All Solution for Archives and Records Management. (2026). hal.science. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22789529

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work