✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
8 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus?
Yes. Multiple reference and peer-reviewed sources state that Ernest Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus, generally dating it to 1911 based on the Geiger–Marsden scattering experiments.
Verdict: SUPPORTED · 8 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 8
Get citation
Atomic nucleus. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_nucleus
See more details
More for · 7
Get citation
The atomic nucleus. (2012). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0027134912010092
Get citation
LibreTexts: 2.1 Atomic Theory. (n.d.). chem.libretexts.org. https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Valley_City_State_University/Chem_115/Chapter_2%3A_Atomic_Structure/2.1_Atomic_Theory
Get citation
Simple English Wikipedia: Ernest Rutherford. (n.d.). simple.wikipedia.org. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Rutherford
Get citation
Heilbron, J. L. (2003). Ernest Rutherford And The Explosion Of Atoms. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/ernest-rutherford-and-the-explosion-of-atoms-oxford-portraits-in-science-by-j.-l.-heilbron-z-lib.org
Get citation
Rutherford’s Atom: 1897–1945. (2026). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781837679690-00320
Get citation
Radioactive Decay Law (Rutherford–Soddy). (2009). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_183
Get citation
Collaboration, S. (2015). Measurement of interaction between antiprotons. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/arxiv-1507.07158
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work