trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Mainstream medicine intentionally ignores natural remedies for financial profit.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that mainstream medicine intentionally ignores natural remedies for financial profit?

Unclear. One fact-check item calls the narrative that mainstream medicine disregards natural cures for profit flawed, and one paper notes Western treatment marginalises traditional Māori healing, attributing that gap to colonisation rather than profit. Neither item supplies evidence settling the claim's financial-motive assertion.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 2
Get citation
Wellness influencers claim mainstream medicine ignores natural remedies. They’re wrong. (n.d.). science.feedback.org. https://science.feedback.org/wellness-influencers-wrongly-claim-mainstream-medicine-ignores-natural-remedies/

See more details
More against · 1
2026
Get citation
MTR, C., RT, C., J, J., R, P., & S, P. (2026). Shifting the Overton Window: enhancing therapeutic outcomes for Māori experiencing Ngā Māuiui kai (eating disorders) through the integration of traditional Māori and Western healing systems in Aotearoa New Zealand.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1795945

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work