trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

First-order logic is complete.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that first-order logic is complete?

Yes. Multiple reference sources state that first-order logic is complete, citing Gödel's completeness theorem, which establishes sound and complete deductive systems for first-order logic.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 5
Get citation
First-order logic. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic

See more details
More for · 4
Get citation
Gödel's completeness theorem - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_completeness_theorem

1977
Get citation
1937-, B. F. R. (1977). Studying deductive logic. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/studyingdeductiv0000berg

2000
Get citation
1929-, H. J. (2000). On Gödel. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/ongodel0000hint

Get citation
Art, Q. (n.d.). Automated development of fundamental mathematical theories. archive.org. https://archive.org/details/automateddevelop0000quai

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work