trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Men have lower-pitched voices than women.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
5 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that men have lower-pitched voices than women?

Yes. A public-speaking textbook states directly that men generally have lower-pitched voices than women. Several other sources describe voice pitch as sexually dimorphic and note that women on average have higher-pitched voices than men, though these treat it as background rather than a direct comparison.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 5 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

Evidence for · 5
Get citation
Encyclopedia of Perception Volume 1 and 2. (n.d.). archive.org. https://archive.org/details/Encyclopedia_of_Perception_Volume_1_and_2

See more details
More for · 4
Get citation
Preferences for Very Low and Very High Voice Pitch in Humans. (n.d.). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032719

Get citation
PubMed: Laryngoscopic and voice characteristics of aged persons.. (n.d.). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7356434/

Get citation
Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311

Get citation
OpenStax Writing Guide with Handbook: 19.7 Spotlight on … Delivery/Public Speaking. (n.d.). openstax.org. https://openstax.org/books/writing-guide/pages/ef4a1ae1-357a-4aeb-981b-4076452afbf0@

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work