trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Rhyming statements are judged more likely to be true than the same statements without rhyme.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Rhyming statements are judged more likely to be true than the same statements without rhyme?

Yes. A peer-reviewed study of aphorisms found that rhyming versions were judged more accurate than semantically equivalent non-rhyming versions, and a reference summary of experiments reports the same rhyme-as-reason effect.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Rhyme-as-reason effect - Wikipedia. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhyme-as-reason_effect

See more details
More for · 2
2004
Get citation
Robinson-Riegler, B. & Robinson-Riegler, G. (2004). Readings in Cognitive Psychology. books.google.com. http://books.google.com/books?id=3DQQAQAAIAAJ&dq=Rhyming+statements+are+judged+more+likely+to+be+true+than+the+same+statements+without+rhyme.&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

Get citation
Birds of a Feather Flock Conjointly (?): Rhyme as Reason in Aphorisms. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00282

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work