trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Aristotle thought virtue is necessary for happiness.

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
6 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that Aristotle thought virtue is necessary for happiness?

Yes. A philosophy reference states directly that Aristotle regarded virtue as necessary for a person to be happy. Other sources describe Aristotle's link between virtuous activity and happiness but do not state the necessity as explicitly.

Verdict: SUPPORTED · 6 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

Evidence for · 6
Get citation
Wikipedia: Philosophy of happiness. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_happiness

See more details
More for · 5
2024
Get citation
Wadell, P. J. (2024). Happiness and the Christian Moral Life. play.google.com. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ex6AEQAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api

Get citation
Aristotle’s Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). (n.d.). plato.stanford.edu. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/

2011
Get citation
Virtue and eudaimonia in Rosalind Hursthouse's moral philosophy. (2011). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2298/theo1101037j

2016
Get citation
Devettere, R. J. (2016). Practical Decision Making in Health Care Ethics. play.google.com. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=iRQsDAAAQBAJ&source=gbs_api

2020
Get citation
What Is Eudaimonia?. (2020). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37027-5_3

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work