trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Knowledge-how can be entirely reduced to propositional knowledge-that.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Philosophical literature establishes that intellectualism about knowledge-how is heavily contested, with standard counterexamples and arguments demonstrating that practical knowledge-how is not entirely reducible to propositional knowledge-that.

The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

The recorded search did not run a separate search for evidence against it.

Evidence against · 1
Recorded source metadata

Does Knowledge Intellectualism Have a Gettier Problem?. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521123.59.2.04

Knowledge intellectualism is the view that knowledge-how requires propositional knowledge. Knowledge intellectualism has a Gettier problem, or so many of its critics allege. The essence of this problem is that knowledge-how is compatible with epistemic luck in a way that ordinary propositional knowledge is not. Hence, knowledge-how can allegedly be had in the absence of knowledge-that, a fact inconsistent with knowledge intellectualism. This paper develops two responses to this challenge to knowledge intellectualism. First, it is not clear that propositional knowledge is incompatible with the forms of epistemic luck with which knowledge-how is allegedly compatible. Second, existing cases intended to serve as counterexamples to knowledge intellectualism are flawed, and revised versions of these cases no longer elicit the judgments necessary to challenge knowledge intellectualism.

See more details
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review07 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt