trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Most DNA mutations arise from copying errors during DNA replication that the cell's proofreading and repair systems fail to correct.

the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that most DNA mutations arise from copying errors during DNA replication that the cell's proofreading and repair systems fail to correct?

Partly. Peer-reviewed sources partially support the claim: yeast and mechanistic work shows replication errors escaping proofreading and mismatch repair become mutations, and one review proposes proofreading inhibition lets replication errors fix as somatic mutations. Other peer-reviewed items attribute substantial mutagenesis to double-strand break repair, transcription-replication conflicts, repair-driven substitutions, and error-prone translesion synthesis, so the evidence covers only part of the picture and points both ways.

Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 2 sources for, 4 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
2001
Get citation
Greene, C. N. & Jinks-Robertson, S. (2001). Spontaneous Frameshift Mutations in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>: Accumulation During DNA Replication and Removal by Proofreading and Mismatch Repair Activities. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/159.1.65

Evidence against · 4
2026
Get citation
S, D., S, W., N, S., Q, W., S, Z., C, M., E, S., T, C., V, L., L, T., R, B., & JE, H. (2026). Mutations and structural variants arising during double-strand break repair.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2504584123

See more details
More for · 1
2026
Get citation
JJ, B. (2026). Selective Inhibition of DNA Polymerase Proofreading: A Metabolic-Fidelity Mechanism Explains Agent Orange-Associated Myelodysplasia.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172734

More against · 3
2026
Get citation
E, Z., F, M., YA, B., & K, M. (2026). ERCC6 at the Transcription-Replication Interface: Integration of Transcription-Coupled Repair with Replication Stress Responses.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27167396

2011
Get citation
For Genomes, Repetition Breeds Diversity. (2011). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001079

2026
Get citation
A, B., GP, L., RK, P., A, B., B, H., KS, R., S, K., PS, S., A, D., JA, T., & TK, P. (2026). Exploiting DNA damage tolerance for precision oncology.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2026.08.003

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work