trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Speed reading improves memory for the text that is read.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that speed reading improves memory for the text that is read?

No. A reference text states speed reading is essentially incompatible with long-term memory, and a peer-reviewed study found a speed-accuracy trade-off with less accurate recall of details at fast reading speeds.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 2 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 2
Speed Reading
Get citation
Speed Reading. (n.d.). en.wikibooks.org. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Speed_Reading

See more details
More against · 1
The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen
2000
Get citation
Dyson, M. & Haselgrove, M. (2000). The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00115

Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work