trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Playing video games reduces the risk of developing dementia.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that playing video games reduces the risk of developing dementia?

Unclear. The retrieved items show only that video game play is associated with better performance on cognitive tests and faster reaction times, and one large cohort examines device use and neurodegenerative disease risk without reporting a gaming-specific dementia result. No item directly measures whether playing video games reduces the risk of developing dementia.

Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 3
2023
Get citation
Video games and board games: Effects of playing practice on cognition. (2023). hal.science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283654

See more details
More for · 2
2025
Get citation
Y, X., S, Z., Y, M., S, W., C, L., Y, L., & H, S. (2025). Long-Term Impact of Using Mobile Phones and Playing Computer Games on the Brain Structure and the Risk of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Large Population-Based Study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2196/59663

Get citation
Increasing Speed of Processing With Action Video Games. (n.d.). cir.nii.ac.jp. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01660.x

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work