trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Daylight saving time benefits farmers.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
1 source for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that daylight saving time benefits farmers?

No. A reference article states the idea that daylight saving time was implemented for farmers' benefit is a myth, and that farmers have been among the strongest lobbying groups against it since it began. The remaining items concern health, accidents, energy and general benefits, not farmers.

Verdict: REFUTED · 1 source for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 1
2011
Get citation
Daylight Saving Bill (Money). (2011). hansard.parliament.uk. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2011-11-22/debates/111122110000002

Evidence against · 1
Get citation
Daylight saving time. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work